RSS

Denver Airport’s Free Wifi: The Future of Internet

I’m currently in transit between Honolulu and San Antonio, and for a few hours I’m hanging out in the Denver Airport, which is amazingly boring. The one thing Denver does right is WiFi. I don’t fly too much, but I’ve never been to an airport that offered free WiFi. LAX makes you purchase a T-Mobile hotspot pass, and I believe O’hare does as well. Getting free WiFi in the lovely San Antonio International airport sucks just as bad.

Honestly, we’re well into the internet revolution, and we’re really starting to need to have internet access at all times. Yes, we have our new 3G iPhones and our EVDO cards, but WiFi is still the best. It really won’t be that long from now where you can walk through any metropolitan city and catch wireless signals without having to use any cell towers. Google’s already doing this in San Francisco, but this really needs to pick up speed because the demand is tremendously high.

For instance, just take airports as your example. How many people pass through an airport in one day? How many of those people are on business? And then, how many of those want to answer emails and communicate with their colleagues. Plus, you have to consider all the tourist traffic that wouldn’t mind hopping online for a few seconds to check their blogs, or see the scores for their favorite sports teams.

There is a HUGE demand, and the answer is not to install hotspots and charge for it. That alienates users, pisses people off, and restricts people from actually using the internet. I’m only at the airport for a few hours. I’m not going to spend 10 bucks for a day pass. I’ll just not get online. Instead of charging a fee to get online, airports and all wireless providers should act how Denver has.

When I logged in, I see a screen informing me that I can get free WiFi. I just need to watch a quick commercial, and then browse all webpages with a header that offers quick links to flights and such (probably able to disable this somehow with GreaseMonkey).

Default screen

I see this as the wave of the future. I honestly don’t mind this type of advertising. It’s well worth the little time I have to look at the ad in order to get free wireless internet. Not only do users like this, hotspot creators should love this too. In an oversaturated web marketplace, advertising is becoming less and less effective. I don’t think I have ever clicked on a Google AdSense ad, and I rarely click on any kind of banner ad, but here is a chance to show a full 30 second video ad to a user, who most likely will watch it because they have nothing else to do. You’re going to get serious eyeballs with these kind of ads.

All in all, this a win-win for both the companies providing the WiFi and for the users accessing it. We get free access to our ever-more digital lifestyle, and companies can make real money off of advertising.

I think a cost breakdown between 24-hour passes bought at hotspots and users willing to watch a 30 second ad will favor the free/advertising model significantly. It’s only a matter of time before companies realize this, and we will start to get numerous wireless access zones around the city, airports, and eventually everywhere. What do you think? Would you prefer free, ad-supported web viewing over paid internet access?

  • travis
    they really oughta offer both. Like premium services that allow you to remove the ads and get higher speeds. ( I think pownce is one person who does this )

    -Sent from my iPhone : )
  • Lisa
    Denver's wifi, though free, sucks. Connections are low.
  • When I was traveling from the states back to the UK last year I got great (free) WiFi in Tampa Airport. Very good connection too. I was able to push 25mbps and it was lunchtime!

    I only used it to check emails and such before the long flight but it was a pretty decent connection. No adverts or anything either!
  • dan
    They need to have paid service beacuse the ad is causing the site i need to be at to crash. Therefore the ad base sucks. works fine for simple e-mail.
  • akasek
    I don't like the style of the ads - disrupting the internet page you are viewing - causing problems with some sites/services:
    * interferes with browser navigation (back and forward buttons)
    * breaks site refresh (control-r)
    * changes the URL in the title bar, so you can't copy it and send to a friend
    * interferes with some sites that use ajax

    I have a laptop with 1024x600 resolution, great for traveling, but the Denver free wifi ad takes up over 21% of the IE browsing window.
    Imagine what it would do to a phone browser!

    I would rather they used a less intrusive, and most likely more effective form of advertising, like posters around the airport supporting free-wifi. Or ads printed on the ticket jackets.
  • David
    Phoenix Sky Harbor has free wifi, with no ads.

    I'm in Denver now and hate the screen real-estate that I'm losing, not to mention that this permanent frame makes every url I click not display in the address bar, hence I can't copy and paste anything useful (work-around I just discovered is to right-click and open link in new window).

    Plus I had to see an ad when I started. I'm annoyed by the distracting rotating banners on the top of my screen and may switch to my Verizon card just to not have to put up with it.
  • lilianhutan
    I know it's boring and all to sit around while you wait for your flight, but I think the money could be spent in a much useful way, like per say for better parking service, which I'm sorry to say is offensively bad, not like the places I visited, for example Gatwick parking which is pretty decent. Still I have to say it doesn't hurt to have a good internet connection wherever you are.
blog comments powered by Disqus
« Photos from Hawaii and the Office | iLovePhotos Demos at DEMOfall 08 »