http://dbachrach.com/blog/2007/08/nsflow-a-call-to-apple-for-coverflow-system-wide/ a developer blog Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:40:21 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://dbachrach.com/blog/2007/08/nsflow-a-call-to-apple-for-coverflow-system-wide/#comment-772 Jake Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:18:22 +0000 http://dbachrach.com/blog/2007/08/15/nsflow-a-call-to-apple-for-coverflow-system-wide/#comment-772 CoverFlow API is here - its just private. Try a gander at the private parts of ImageKit using class-dump CoverFlow API is here – its just private. Try a gander at the private parts of ImageKit using class-dump

]]> http://dbachrach.com/blog/2007/08/nsflow-a-call-to-apple-for-coverflow-system-wide/#comment-771 Matt L. Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:51:20 +0000 http://dbachrach.com/blog/2007/08/15/nsflow-a-call-to-apple-for-coverflow-system-wide/#comment-771 I agree with you that Apple *should* create an API for it. But I dont want an API for it. The last thing I want to see is CoverFlow being incorporated into applications where it doesn't make sense. Unfortunately this would be more often than where it does make sense. Apple doesn't create superfluous eye candy. They create/implement functional eye candy. CoverFlow is cool tech. The last thing Apple wants is for it to get over saturated. When Form is more important than function you wind up with apps like Disco. :) I agree with you that Apple *should* create an API for it. But I dont want an API for it. The last thing I want to see is CoverFlow being incorporated into applications where it doesn’t make sense. Unfortunately this would be more often than where it does make sense. Apple doesn’t create superfluous eye candy. They create/implement functional eye candy. CoverFlow is cool tech. The last thing Apple wants is for it to get over saturated. When Form is more important than function you wind up with apps like Disco.

]]>