RSS

Network Neutrality – A Speech

Johnny Cox has written a good speech over network neutrality and its effect. Check it out here. Reprinted below for ease:

How many of you have ever been on or seen a toll road? A toll road is a road that you pay to use in order to get to your destination quicker. Well what if the cost of using that toll road was so expensive that you couldn’t use it. And let’s also say that the alternative route was so slow that you might never get to your destination. That’s exactly what could happen to our internet if congress is successfully bought out by big telephone companies like AT&T and Time Warner.

Right now these companies are lobbying multi-million dollar campaigns to gain the right to set-up a multi-tiered internet. This means that websites that pay them will be put into the express lane allowing for faster speeds to the internet. This also means that websites that won’t or cannot afford to pay will be put into the lower tier and speed will be limited. So let’s say you wanted to go to google.com. You type the address into the address bar push enter. What happens? Well, you would not be instantly connected to Google. Instead, it would be so slow that you opt to go to yahoo.com instead. By this way, these companies are regulating what you see and where you go. There is only one thing stopping these companies from doing just that.

The rule that keeps these companies in check is called network neutrality. Network neutrality ensures all users can access the content or run applications and devices of their choice. Network neutrality is the first amendment to the internet. Unfortunately, net neutrality is not a law but more of a guideline. So, companies have been stepping over the boundaries more and more. Lawrence Lessig created network neutrality to have 3 principles: Non-discrimination, interconnection, and access. Non-discrimination is all traffic must be treated the same. This means that no user or website be given special privileges. Interconnection is everyone and everything must be connected. Or no one can be blocked from accessing content. And access is any user can connect to any other user. Meaning, I can email anyone that I desire without fear that it will be blocked. All of these principles will be obsolete if congress doesn’t pass an amendment making network neutrality a law.

An amendment has already been sent to congress but it was rejected 34 to 22. Numerous websites have been made to unite people around the world and inform people of the danger that could affect us all. Savetheinternet.com has created a coalition of people and organizations all dedicated to preserving network neutrality. All of the websites and organizations all urge people to call their representatives and demand that net neutrality be preserved. Despite having companies like Amazon.com, EarthLink, EBay, Google, Intel, Microsoft, Skype, Vonage and Yahoo, we are still losing a battle that will have disastrous results if something isn’t done now. Vinton Cerf, creator of the internet, says “The remarkable social impact and economic success of the Internet is in many ways directly attributable to the architectural characteristics that were part of its design.” Which basically means the internet is so popular because of the freedom it provides. Taking this freedom away should be a crime and punishable by death.

Not only is it wrong, but it is an invasion on our privacy and rights. No one should be able to tell you what websites are better or what search engines to use. That is up to you to determine and choose for yourself. What if HEB told you what food you liked whether or not you liked it? Or a car salesman told you that this car looked better than this one. How would you react to that? This is exactly what is going to happen to our internet unless you do something about it. This is not only going to effect normal everyday users like us, but also small businesses trying to make it. The internet is a major source of income in many new businesses. These businesses are not going to have the money to pay for the premium service they need. Thus, failing the business and the money that would be exchanged. This is going to affect the world as a whole, from our economy, down to our personal lives. If the phone companies get their way, internet use will drop and only privileged people will benefit from the new system.

If we don’t put a stop to these companies right now, the internet will be for the rich and powerful only, while everyone else reverts back to the reliable, but slower library. If this bothers you in the least, then call up your representative and let him know how you feel. Tell your friends to do the same and spread the word of this threat to everyone you know so that our freedom will not be taken away.

  • T-rav
    i just want to say for the record i wouldn't exactly consider time warner a telephone company, but i'll keep reading cause johnny sits behind me every day
  • Hopeless,

    Yes, legislators do not have a very wide experience with the Internet, but the regulation we are talking about will only help college kids and the like. Without laws to protect the equality of the Internet, we lose this fantastic resource. How is Net Neutrality a burden that will "very well stymie the college kids working in their basement on the next big thing?"
  • hopeless
    "why should congress not take preemptive action against this behavior?"

    beause by and large, legislators don't understand the internet as a medium or as an industry. because burdensome regulations could very well stymie the college kids working in thier basement on the next big thing.
  • These are all good points. My feeling is that despite AT&T;'s heavy lobbying, we won't see this sort of thing coming to reality. Although I think very little of these big business companies, they aren't that stupid. It's not comprehensible that a user won't see that google is taking forever to load and yahoo is not consistently. They will get pissed. This will only cause AT&T; bad press. Johnny has a point that we should contact our congressman immediately. If they aren't passing laws yet that doesn't mean you shouldn't inform your representatives of your stance. Stevens, why should congress not take preemptive action against this behavior? Let's set it in stone now that the net should be a free place.
  • Stevens
    What is more to consider on this issue is that there has not been any cases of net neutrality being violated. It just isn't happening and it won't. Why should anyone want Congress to get invovled where there isn't a problem?
  • pkp646
    Skywatcher makes some really good points. If these ISPs really did try and block or slow content they would lose business in a heart beat. The deal with net neutrality is that it is always better to keep the government out of it.
  • Sorry that would be Trace "Shawty" H... He's in my Comp Sci class. I appoligize for his insolence.
  • fag
    nice spamming on digg, queerbate
  • Johnny
    That would be a good argument but ISPs have already blocked numerous things. Do a little research and there are many examples where ISPs have overstepped their boundaries. So, this isn't an argument abuot what might happen, it's an argument about what is happening. Now some of my examples were what ifs but the fact remains that they have already gone too far. And if this starts happening, all ISPs will be in this new system. AT&T and Time Warner alone have put enough money into this that they will spend as much money as they need in order to get what they want.
  • skywatcher
    I don't think regulation is required just because something might happen. I also don't think that consumers will allow their ISPs to significantly hamper their internet experience. If an ISP plays hardball and actually DOES slow a site like Google significantly, then consumers have the right to switch to a new provider. You could argue that there aren't many provider options in any given area, but that just means the already-established regulations that create the monopolies/duopolies should be lessened to allow greater competition. Competition and the free market, not over-regulation, is the key to maintaining network neutrality.
blog comments powered by Disqus
« The Boy Least Likely To, 4.5 stars. | Background Pack 3. Get Your Desktop Changed. »